Assess the quality of a claim
- Check who collected the data, when, how and from which population.
- Distinguish a vendor opinion from independently verified findings.
- Avoid applying global averages directly to local organisations.
CORE1ERP RESOURCES / RESEARCH & INSIGHTS
A research framework for evaluating ERP trends, risks and operational change.
PRACTICAL FIELD GUIDE
Use the guidance below to frame the right questions, set clear responsibilities and move from discussion to a practical next step. Adapt each recommendation to your organisation's policies, regulatory obligations and current systems.
DEEPER PRACTICAL GUIDANCE
Use the following steps to turn this topic into an actionable internal discussion. Adapt them to your organisation’s size, industry, controls and existing systems.
Distinguish whether you are measuring cost reduction, data quality, speed of close, customer response or control effectiveness.
Check the sample size, respondent selection, date, geography, definitions and whether a vendor sponsored the research.
Separate businesses by industry, size, maturity and deployment model before generalising a reported result.
Use a small operational pilot with baseline and post-change measures rather than relying on an external percentage.
Publish only findings supported by attributable sources and documented methods; otherwise present them as hypotheses to validate.
QUESTIONS ANSWERED
No. This page provides an evaluation framework and does not present unverified survey results.
Use evidence to prioritise business requirements, then validate shortlisted systems against your processes.
FROM INSIGHT TO ACTION
Bring your requirements, approval rules and reporting needs to a focused discussion.